Business Associates & Relaxed HIPAA Regulations During COVID-19

April 8, 2020

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has been very active this past month, going above and beyond to help mitigate the risk COVID-19 poses to public health privacy. Certain HIPAA regulations were updated in March to allow for health care practices to better work with patients in need of healthcare services as well as providing guidance on how to best disclose PHI without risk of a data breach. In their latest announcement, the Office for Civil Rights has extended the same enforcement discretion to Business Associates.

When it comes to Business Associates handling PHI, there are obviously strict limitations to follow for the sake of still maintaining patient privacy. As clearly stated in the recent OCR bulletin, business associates are expected to follow the same guidance provided for health care providers when accessing or disclosing PHI during a public health emergency. 

Previously, these disclosure permissions were only allowed if expressly stated within the Business Associate Agreement with the BA’s covered entity. In light of the current situation, there is a greater need to easily provide public health authorities and emergency operation centers with access to COVID-19 related PHI and this bulletin reinforces the Business Associates’ ability to share that information securely. Violations of certain provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule will not be imposed during this time, if and only if:

  • The business associate discloses PHI for good faith uses in certain public health activities or to health oversight agencies (hint, hint the guidance we mentioned above)
  • The business associate must inform the healthcare provider within 10 days after the use or disclosure of PHI 

While this notice provides business associates with greater flexibility than some Business Associate Agreements allow for, that doesn’t mean that BAAs no longer matter. It should be noted the relaxation of enforcement does not extend to any other requirements under HIPAA law, and business associates will still be held liable for any violations outside of this circumstance – provided of course a BAA is in place. 

As a reminder, a Business Associate Agreement allows the covered entity to obtain “satisfactory assurances”  that the business associate will “appropriately safeguard the protected health information it receives or creates on behalf of the covered entity.” This definition, straight from the HHS website, encompasses the need for BA’s to agree in writing to the same standards the covered entity is held to. A BAA must be completed with any vendor or organization the practice sends or receives any piece of PHI from. Without a proper agreement in place, the liability of this security breach will fall on the healthcare provider.  

Contrary to what most might think, HIPAA really is here to help encourage providing access to and sharing of PHI as long as it is done in the right ways and for the right reasons. OCR Director Roger Severino makes this abundantly clear in his statement following the updated bulletin stating, “Granting HIPAA business associates greater freedom to cooperate and exchange information with public health and oversight agencies can help flatten the curve and potentially save lives.” 

This latest bulletin is just additional proof that HIPAA compliance is of the utmost importance during the COVID-19 public health emergency. All eyes right now are on data being shared between multiple government agencies like the HHS, CDC and even the White House. With secure and efficient access to real-time data, those organizations will be enabled to make educated decisions on how to best interpret and utilize the sensitive data received and, in turn, secure the well being of the public at large. We find it extremely comforting to know that by following the OCR’s recent HIPAA guidance, providers and business associates alike can play their part in stopping the spread of COVID-19.

RECENT POSTS

Related posts

Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement

October 9, 2026 No comments yet

October 9, 2026 The latest HIPAA penalty doesn’t involve a hospital system or a massive ransomware attack. It involves a practice that probably looks a lot like yours. Dr. Linda Shen is the owner of Shen Smiles, a solo dental practice with one location in Drums, Pennsylvania. It all started with one patient asking for their health records. It ended with a $140,000 penalty and a much closer look at how the practice handled HIPAA. The lesson? Every HIPAA-regulated practice, big or small, can face enforcement. What happened? It’s unclear when the patient first asked for their records, but patient records need to be provided within 30 days from the initial request. In April 2020, the patient’s attorney filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The patient had asked for their health records multiple times and never got it. Once OCR started digging, the missed request turned out to be just the beginning. Patient records weren’t properly maintained, staff had never received formal HIPAA Privacy Rule training, and there were no policies for handling patient requests. Dr. Shen admitted that the records were never provided because a former employee had taken them. That’s another violation, this theft is a breach, which means it needed to be reported to the OCR, patients needed to be notified, and given options to protect themselves (such as credit monitoring). These are baseline requirements every Covered Entity is expected to have in place. No compliance framework, like policies and training, means no HIPAA playbook, so when a patient asks for records (or records go missing), staff is unprepared and unaware how to handle the situation. In July 2024, OCR proposed a $140,000 Civil Money Penalty. Dr. Shen appealed, but ultimately settled on the full amount. The Takeaway for Practices Patient access has been an OCR priority for years through its HIPAA Right of Access Initiative. And as this case shows, one complaint is all it takes to open the door to a review of your entire compliance program. Now is the time to ask: Do we have written HIPAA policies our team can find? Do we have a process to answer every record request within 30 days? Can we prove every team member has completed HIPAA training? If any of those gave you pause, now’s the time to fix it, before OCR comes asking. Looking for the first step? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand.

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!