HIPAA Audits are Back: 86% of Practices Miss This Crucial Requirement (And How to Fix It)

May 29, 2024

The random HIPAA audits are officially back. Melanie Fontes Rainer, Director of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), confirmed in a recent interview that the OCR is proactively conducting audits as part of a series of improvements. 

Following a five-year hiatus from proactive audits, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has been updating key HIPAA regulations. For instance, the OCR is also releasing an updated Security Rule by the end of the year to better reflect innovation since its original publication over twenty years ago. 

As the OCR continues to advance HIPAA rules, it’s vital to be prepared with a foundation of a compliant practice. 

At the base of this foundation is the Security Risk Analysis (SRA), a commonly missing HIPAA requirement. During the last round of proactive audits, 86% of Covered Entities could not show a properly documented SRA for their practice. 

What is a Security Risk Analysis (SRA)? 

The OCR defines an SRA as “an accurate and thorough assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).”

The SRA is focused on protecting ePHI. It is a continuous requirement and needs to be updated when significant changes occur to your practice. It’s best practice to complete the SRA at least annually. 

An SRA is a complete evaluation of how PHI is protected. Questions include encryption practices, staff training, disposal of PHI, and more. 

Why is the SRA Important? 

The SRA documents proof that a practice has appropriate safeguards to protect sensitive patient data. It requires practices to conduct self-audits and identify risks and vulnerabilities before they become issues. This means anticipating vulnerabilities and implementing preventative measures before sensitive data is compromised.

If followed correctly, the SRA acts as a vital line of defense, helping prevent data breaches, ensuring patient privacy, and building trust within the healthcare system. 

How do I complete an SRA? 

Completing an SRA is crucial for protecting sensitive patient data. The good news is that several approaches are available, each with varying costs and timelines.

Before starting an SRA, it is essential to have an HCO, or HIPAA Compliance Officer, in place to manage HIPAA documentation and the SRA process. 

You can complete the SRA internally using online resources provided by the OCR. While there are free resources, this option is less intuitive than others, can be time-intensive, and requires significant team effort. Manual audits can take weeks to months to complete. 

You could also hire an external auditor or consultant to complete your SRA. Hiring a consultant might reduce the burden on your team but can be costly. The average price of an external auditor is in the thousands, with some costing upwards of $20,000. Additionally, these external audits can take months. 

An alternative option is intelligent compliance software, which provides significant benefits for meeting the SRA requirement and more. It allows you and your practice to navigate the SRA cost-effectively and efficiently. While a manual audit usually takes weeks to months, an audit assisted by software can be completed in significantly less time, simplifying the SRA process, and saving your practice substantial costs and assuring protection.  

Why Should I Use Compliance Software?

As the Security Rule is updated, your compliance program also deserves an upgrade. 

Intelligent software solutions can help you easily fulfill complex HIPAA requirements, prepare for potential risks and vulnerabilities, and protect patient data. Many organizations overlook the SRA, but software solutions can streamline the process and protect your practice.

To learn more about Abyde’s innovative software solutions, schedule an educational consultation.  

RECENT POSTS

Related posts

Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement

October 9, 2026 No comments yet

October 9, 2026 The latest HIPAA settlement doesn’t involve a hospital system or a massive ransomware attack. It involves a practice that probably looks a lot like yours. Shen Smiles is a solo dental practice in Drums, Pennsylvania. It started with a former patient’s complaint about getting their health records. It led to a broader OCR investigation and a $140,000 settlement. The lesson? Every HIPAA-regulated organization, big or small, can face enforcement.   What happened? Under federal law, patients must be given access to their records within 30 days, with one possible 30-day extension if the patient is notified in writing within the first 30 days. In April 2020, a former patient’s attorney filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The complaint alleged that the patient had requested their records multiple times without receiving access. The public documents don’t say when the first request was made. OCR’s investigation went beyond the original complaint. According to the resolution agreement, OCR found that patient records weren’t properly maintained and that staff hadn’t received formal HIPAA Privacy Rule training. OCR also said the practice couldn’t produce evidence that it had HIPAA policies and procedures in place, including for patient access requests, or that it had reasonably safeguarded patient information. During the investigation, the practice stated that it couldn’t provide the records because a workforce member had stolen them. The public documents don’t address whether a breach assessment was done. As a general rule, though, HIPAA presumes that an impermissible acquisition, access, use, or disclosure of unsecured patient information is a breach. A breach can require notifying HHS and affected patients, including steps patients can take to protect themselves. These are baseline requirements every covered entity is expected to have in place. Policies and training give a team a HIPAA playbook. Without one, staff at any practice may not know what to do when a patient asks for records or records go missing. OCR proposed a $140,000 civil money penalty in July 2024. Shen Smiles requested a hearing before an administrative law judge, but the two sides reached a resolution agreement in August 2026, before the hearing took place. Under the agreement, the practice agreed to pay $140,000. The agreement is not an admission of liability.   The Takeaway for Practices Patient access has been an OCR priority for years through its HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this case marks its 56th Right of Access enforcement action. It also took more than six years from complaint to resolution. As this case shows, a single complaint can lead to a broader look at your compliance program. Now is the time to ask: Do we have written HIPAA policies our team can find? Do we have a process to answer every record request within 30 days? Can we prove every team member has completed HIPAA training? If any of those gave you pause, now’s the time to fix it, before OCR comes asking. Looking for the first step? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!