OCR Announces Historic 5 HIPAA Settlements at Once

September 15, 2020

Earlier today the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced five HIPAA settlements (yes, you heard that right, five) breaking the record for total HIPAA settlements in one day. 

Since 2019 the OCR has honed in on their HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, prioritizing patient’s ability to access their medical records in a timely manner. These five settlements bring the total to seven access related enforcement actions – so if you need any hints on what to make sure your practice is looking out for, this is it.   

1. Housing Works Inc.

This $38,000 fine resulted from a complaint received by the OCR last July alleging that Housing Works Inc., a New York City based non-profit organization, failed to provide the complainant with a copy of their medical records. The OCR received a second complaint a month later stating that the practice still hadn’t provided the patient with record access (strike number two) which ultimately led to a hefty fine along with a corrective action plan.  

2. All Inclusive Medical Service, Inc.

This Carmichael, CA based medical practice agreed to a $15,000 fine and corrective action plan after the OCR received a complaint in April 2018 that the practice had denied patient access to inspect and receive a copy of her records in January 2018. Only after the OCR’s investigation was the patient given access to her records – 32 months (almost three years) after she had initially requested.  

3. Beth Israel Lahey Health Behavioral Services (BILHBS)

This whopping $70,000 HIPAA settlement came from a complaint alleging that the behavioral health corporation failed to respond to a request from a personal representative seeking access to her father’s medical records in February 2019. The OCR investigation found that BILHBS failed to complete the request which meant a costly violation of HIPAA Right of Access. 

4. Wise Psychiatry, PC

This Psychiatry Practice based in Colorado agreed to a $10,000 settlement along with a corrective action plan after the OCR received a patient right of access complaint related to not providing a personal representative with access to their minor son’s medical records in February of 2018. The OCR provided the practice with technical assistance and closed the complaint just a few months later, but Wise Psychiatry found themselves back on the OCR’s radar in October 2018 when a second complaint from the same individual was filed noting records still had not been received. It wasn’t until May 2019 that the patient records were finally provided. 

5. King MD

Last but not least (actually, we take that back, this is the smallest HIPAA fine to date), Patricia King MD & Associates – a psychiatric care provider in Chesapeake, Virginia – agreed to pay a $3,500 fine along with adopting a corrective action plan to settle a potential HIPAA right of access violation. In October of 2018, the OCR received a complaint that the practice had failed to respond to an individual’s request to record access in August 2018. After the OCR provided them with technical assistance the complaint was closed. However, in February 2019, the OCR received a second complaint stating that King MD had still failed to provide the same patient with proper access and as a result, the practice was hit with a violation.  

The main takeaways? Well if it isn’t already obvious, providing patients with timely access to their medical records is extremely important and is something that is commonly missed by practices. While Patient Right of Access is an enforcement priority for the OCR, that doesn’t mean it’s the only thing you have to watch out for. OCR Director Roger Severino emphasized in the announcement that, “Today’s announcement is about empowering patients and holding health care providers accountable for failing to take their HIPAA obligations seriously enough.” 

If you needed any more reason to get HIPAA compliance to the top of your priority list – 5 violation settlements announced all in one day should do the trick.  

 

 

RECENT POSTS

Related posts

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!

OSF Healthcare HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What OSF Healthcare’s Ransomware Fine Teaches Every Practice About SRAs

August 5, 2026 No comments yet

August 5, 2026 The latest HIPAA fine is another clear reminder that ransomware attacks are, unfortunately, here to stay in the healthcare industry. A settlement involving the OSF Healthcare System was recently announced by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). As an enterprise healthcare provider in the midwest, the organization serves 174 locations, including 16 hospitals – a prime target for a ransomware attack.    So, what happened?  In April 2021, OSF discovered that they joined the unlucky club of ransomware victims when a malicious actor deployed Nephilim, a ransomware strain made to target larger organizations. Once the ransomware infected OSF systems, the hacker demanded payment or patient Protected Health Information (PHI) would be leaked online. In this attack, sensitive information like financial account information, driver’s license numbers, medical record numbers, and more, were all exposed. Over 53,000 patient records were exposed in this attack.  When ransomware attacks in healthcare have soared 278% in recent years, it’s more of a when then an if your organization doesn’t have the right safeguards in place.  While the breach was discovered in April, OSF healthcare reported the breach to the OCR in October. The OCR took it from there, digging into what precautions (or lack thereof) let this happen.  What did the OCR discover? If you’ve read any of our other fine breakdowns, you already know where this is going: another missing Security Risk Analysis (SRA).  The SRA is a required document every HIPAA-regulated entity (ie: every practice and their Business Associates that handle patient information) needs to complete. The SRA is a thorough review of the physical, technical, and administrative safeguards in place to prevent PHI ending up in the wrong hands. While the OCR didn’t specify exactly how the ransomware got into OSF’s system, a technical safeguard vulnerability was very likely the entry point. A proactive SRA could have flagged that gap before it turned into a major breach. In addition to missing this required documentation, OSF also took too long to report the breach to the OCR and notify affected patients. This is a direct violation of the Breach Notification Rule, which requires organizations to notify patients within 60 days of a discovered breach. Moreover, since the breach impacted more than 500 patients, OSF was also required to report this breach to the OCR within 2 months as well. Time is of the essence in every component of a breach, from securing systems to ensuring affected parties are aware to protect themselves and an over five month delay was unacceptable in the eyes of the OCR.    What was the result?  OSF’s settlement tops the list as the largest fine of the year, coming in at $552,250, plus government monitoring for the next two years.  It’s very important to note that this breach occurred in 2021, meaning that over five years were spent from the initial breach, to investigations, to the public press releases. Also, the average cost of a healthcare breach is over 7 million dollars –  from implementing secure systems, notifying patients, legal fees, and more. The Takeaway While the settlement payment and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) are just the cherries on top, this experience was a tremendous cost of time, money, and resources, highlighting the importance of making sure everything is secure before a situation occurs.  So, when was the last time you looked at your SRA? It’s time to seriously analyze your current compliance posture. Ransomware groups don’t check whether you’re a small dental office or a 16-hospital health system before they attack, they check whether the door was left open. Time and again, OCR’s findings come back to the same root cause: organizations can’t secure what they haven’t even identified as a problem. Looking to review your current compliance standings? Meet with our team of experts for a complimentary educational consultation.