Skip to content
  • About Us
    • Who We Serve
  • Solutions
    • HIPAA for Covered Entities
    • OSHA for Healthcare
    • HIPAA for Business Associates
    • SRA for Covered Entities
    • Abyde Incident Response Program
    • Abyde Reseller Program
  • Resources
  • News
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Login
    • HIPAA for Covered Entities
    • OSHA for Healthcare
    • HIPAA for Business Associates
    • SRA for Covered Entities
SIGN UP
BOOK A DEMO

Should I Share This? When Sharing PHI is HIPAA Approved

June 18, 2020

We get it, the struggle is real. The moans and groans with HIPAA always seem to get louder when medical practices are faced with figuring out to whom and how sensitive data can be shared. Contrary to what many believe, HIPAA is all about properly sharing protected health information (PHI) – not preventing it entirely. Sometimes, lacking confidence that internal policies are in alignment with best practices on sharing PHI securely can cause a practice to hesitate to (or altogether not) send PHI to other parties requesting it, including other providers. Unfortunately, not acting in a timely manner and failing to comply with the request to share PHI with another provider can be a costly one. Proper disclosure of PHI is highly regulated under HIPAA when it comes to sharing or receiving patient records from another practice, and there are consequences to both sharing too much information – or not enough.

First, the HIPAA Privacy Rule does in fact permit a health care provider to share patient information for treatment and healthcare operation purposes without needing written patient authorization as long as the reasonable safeguards to protect the information are used. To clarify what the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) considers as treatment and operation purposes, “Treatment means the provision, coordination, or management of healthcare and related services by one or more health care providers, including the coordination or management of health care by a health care provider with a third party; consultation between health care providers relating to a patient; or the referral of a patient for health care from one health care provider to another.” 

Some key notes on sharing PHI between providers: 

  • Both providers must have a treatment or consultative role with the patient – whether past or present.
  • The PHI requested or provided must pertain only to the relationship of the provider and patient.
  • The disclosure must contain only the minimum information necessary and both practices involved in the exchange must implement the required technical safeguards when sharing electronically.
  • The practice does not need written authorization from the patient to share records with the practice requesting records, as long as it is for treatment of the patient.
  • A practice is permitted to disclose records that were created by another doctor – for instance, if one of your patients had records transferred to your office from their previous doctor, you are able to then transfer these records over to another doctor as part of their complete medical record.

Additionally, if a patient is the one requesting their records to be sent to another provider:

  • HIPAA law requires the practice to fulfill this request under a reasonable timeframe – typically, within 30 days of the request. Failure to provide this information within the timeframe is a violation of the Patient Right of Access Law and cost one covered entity in Florida an $85,000 fine. 
  • There might be state regulations regarding provider-to-provider disclosures and timeframes that may be more restrictive than HIPAA law.
  • If a patient asks for a copy of their records, your practice should accept the request both in writing as well as electronically, especially during this transition of social distancing following COVID-19. 
  • The practice can take steps to reasonably verify the identity of the patient making the request, but must not create an unreasonable delay in the disclosing process.

It’s time for providers to change their perspective on HIPAA – which is widely considered a restrictive set of laws and regulations. HIPAA is meant to be a guideline on how to securely and efficiently share sensitive and valuable data. Not a barrier or inhibitor as so many see it now. Being able to do so will have positive effects on the healthcare industry as a whole and improve patient care for years and years. Don’t let the unknowns of HIPAA keep data from those who have lawful access to them such as other providers or patients. If so, it is just as much of a HIPAA violation as sharing sensitive data with the wrong people.

RECENT POSTS

  • Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
    What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement
  • Ambry Phishing Settlement
    $700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice
  • Azul Vision Right of Access
    Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement
PrevPreviousAbyde joins Crystal Practice Management to expand HIPAA compliance among users
NextAbyde partners with Acquios Alliance to deliver HIPAA compliance solutions to private practice optometristsNext

Related posts

Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement

October 9, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

October 9, 2026 The latest HIPAA penalty doesn’t involve a hospital system or a massive ransomware attack. It involves a practice that probably looks a lot like yours. Dr. Linda Shen is the owner of Shen Smiles, a solo dental practice with one location in Drums, Pennsylvania. It all started with one patient asking for their health records. It ended with a $140,000 penalty and a much closer look at how the practice handled HIPAA. The lesson? Every HIPAA-regulated practice, big or small, can face enforcement. What happened? It’s unclear when the patient first asked for their records, but patient records need to be provided within 30 days from the initial request. In April 2020, the patient’s attorney filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The patient had asked for their health records multiple times and never got it. Once OCR started digging, the missed request turned out to be just the beginning. Patient records weren’t properly maintained, staff had never received formal HIPAA Privacy Rule training, and there were no policies for handling patient requests. Dr. Shen admitted that the records were never provided because a former employee had taken them. That’s another violation, this theft is a breach, which means it needed to be reported to the OCR, patients needed to be notified, and given options to protect themselves (such as credit monitoring). These are baseline requirements every Covered Entity is expected to have in place. No compliance framework, like policies and training, means no HIPAA playbook, so when a patient asks for records (or records go missing), staff is unprepared and unaware how to handle the situation. In July 2024, OCR proposed a $140,000 Civil Money Penalty. Dr. Shen appealed, but ultimately settled on the full amount. The Takeaway for Practices Patient access has been an OCR priority for years through its HIPAA Right of Access Initiative. And as this case shows, one complaint is all it takes to open the door to a review of your entire compliance program. Now is the time to ask: Do we have written HIPAA policies our team can find? Do we have a process to answer every record request within 30 days? Can we prove every team member has completed HIPAA training? If any of those gave you pause, now’s the time to fix it, before OCR comes asking. Looking for the first step? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand.

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Abyde Logo

1.800.594.0883 | info@abyde.com

Automated HIPAA and OSHA Compliance

Our Reviews

From Our Blog
  • Don’t Get Caught Off Guard: HIPAA Audits are Back!
  • Don’t Be a Statistic: Why OSHA Compliance Matters in Healthcare
  • What Money Doesn’t Cover: The True Price of HIPAA Non-Compliance
  • HIPAA: It’s Not Just a Training – Your Guide to Continuous Compliance
Solutions
  • HIPAA for Covered Entities
  • OSHA for Healthcare
  • HIPAA for Business Associates
  • SRA for Covered Entities
  • Abyde Incident Response Program
  • Abyde Reseller Program
Resources
  • News
  • Events
  • Partners
  • HIPAA Badges
  • OSHA Badges
  • Learning Center
  • Compliance FAQs
Company
  • About Us
  • Who We Serve
  • Pricing
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • COPYRIGHT © 2026 ABYDE
  • |

  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • |

  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • |

  • SECURITY MEASURES
  • |

  • E-SIGNATURE TERMS