Skip to content
  • About Us
    • Who We Serve
  • Solutions
    • HIPAA for Covered Entities
    • OSHA for Healthcare
    • HIPAA for Business Associates
    • SRA for Covered Entities
    • Abyde Incident Response Program
    • Abyde Reseller Program
  • Resources
  • News
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Login
    • HIPAA for Covered Entities
    • OSHA for Healthcare
    • HIPAA for Business Associates
    • SRA for Covered Entities
SIGN UP
BOOK A DEMO

HHS Proposes Changes to HIPAA Privacy Rule

December 11, 2020

When you thought of HIPAA, was the image that came to mind an old, never-changing and outdated law? If it was, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) just issued a wake-up call with a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), announced yesterday, to make fresh new modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. 

So what may be changing when it comes to HIPAA? The proposed modifications are designed to address barriers to value-based health care, particularly those that limit or discourage care coordination and case management communications, as well as amend provisions of the Privacy Rule that pose “unnecessary regulatory burdens” without sufficiently improving privacy protections.

While the 357 page document contains a lot of information, a few highlights of the proposed changes include:

  • Adding definitions for the terms electronic health record (EHR) and personal health application. 
  • Strengthening individuals’ rights to inspect their PHI in person, includes allowing individuals to take notes or use other personal resources to view and capture images of their PHI.
  • Shortening covered entities’ required response time to no later than 15 calendar days (currently 30 days) and possible extensions to no more than 15 calendar days (currently 30-days).
  • Reducing identity verification burden on individuals exercising their access rights.
  • Creating a pathway for individuals to direct the sharing of PHI in an EHR among covered health care providers and health plans.
  • Amending the definition of ‘health care operations’ to clarify the scope of permitted uses and disclosures for individual-level care coordination and case management. 
  • Specifying when electronic PHI (ePHI) must be provided to the individual at no charge, and amending the permissible fee structure for responding to requests to direct records to a third party.
  • Requiring covered entities to post estimated fee schedules on their websites for access and for disclosures with an individual’s valid authorization and, upon request, provide individualized estimates of fees for an individual’s request for copies of PHI, and itemized bills for completed requests.
  • Creating an exception to the “minimum necessary” standard for individual level care coordination and case management uses and disclosures – proposing to relieve covered entities of the minimum necessary requirement for uses by, disclosures to, or requests by, a health plan or covered health care provider for care coordination and case management activities with respect to an individual, regardless of whether such activities constitute treatment or health care operations.  
  • Eliminating the requirement to obtain an individual’s written acknowledgment of receipt of the provider’s Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP). 
  • Modifying the content requirements of the NPP to clarify for individuals their rights with respect to their PHI and how to exercise those rights. 
  • Expressly permitting disclosures to Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) communications assistance for persons who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind, or who have a speech disability, and modifying the definition of business associate to exclude TRS providers.

There’s a lot to unpack within these proposed changes, but in general, the proposal helps to bring the HIPAA Privacy Rule up to date with current technology usage, in addition to expanding and emphasizing patient’s rights to view, receive, and handle their own PHI. While these rules are just a proposal, it’s highly likely that most of these changes will go into effect (or a similar version of them) once the proposal’s comment period ends.

So when will you need to worry about these changes? Since the proposal’s announcement on December 10th, comments on the notice are due within 60 days. Once the comment period has ended and any changes are finalized, the effective date will be 60 days from the final publication. Your practice will still have a little breathing room, as covered entities would have 180 days from the effective date to update or implement policies to achieve compliance with these new or modified standards – essentially, you’ll have 240 days after the rule is finalized to comply. 

While complying with these proposed Privacy Rule changes won’t be necessary for quite a while, knowing what is coming and preparing your practice ahead of time is still key. If you don’t have a current compliance program in place that reflects the most recent industry threats and updates, consider throwing out what may be a very old HIPAA binder and seeking out a new solution that can help you dynamically update your policies as these changes go into effect next year. 

RECENT POSTS

  • Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
    What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement
  • Ambry Phishing Settlement
    $700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice
  • Azul Vision Right of Access
    Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement
PrevPreviousMeeting December HIPAA Requirements: What Your HIPAA Program is Probably Missing
NextLatest HIPAA Audit Industry ReportNext

Related posts

Dental Practice HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What Every Dental Practice Can Learn From the $140K Shen Smiles Settlement

October 9, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

October 9, 2026 The latest HIPAA penalty doesn’t involve a hospital system or a massive ransomware attack. It involves a practice that probably looks a lot like yours. Dr. Linda Shen is the owner of Shen Smiles, a solo dental practice with one location in Drums, Pennsylvania. It all started with one patient asking for their health records. It ended with a $140,000 penalty and a much closer look at how the practice handled HIPAA. The lesson? Every HIPAA-regulated practice, big or small, can face enforcement. What happened? It’s unclear when the patient first asked for their records, but patient records need to be provided within 30 days from the initial request. In April 2020, the patient’s attorney filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The patient had asked for their health records multiple times and never got it. Once OCR started digging, the missed request turned out to be just the beginning. Patient records weren’t properly maintained, staff had never received formal HIPAA Privacy Rule training, and there were no policies for handling patient requests. Dr. Shen admitted that the records were never provided because a former employee had taken them. That’s another violation, this theft is a breach, which means it needed to be reported to the OCR, patients needed to be notified, and given options to protect themselves (such as credit monitoring). These are baseline requirements every Covered Entity is expected to have in place. No compliance framework, like policies and training, means no HIPAA playbook, so when a patient asks for records (or records go missing), staff is unprepared and unaware how to handle the situation. In July 2024, OCR proposed a $140,000 Civil Money Penalty. Dr. Shen appealed, but ultimately settled on the full amount. The Takeaway for Practices Patient access has been an OCR priority for years through its HIPAA Right of Access Initiative. And as this case shows, one complaint is all it takes to open the door to a review of your entire compliance program. Now is the time to ask: Do we have written HIPAA policies our team can find? Do we have a process to answer every record request within 30 days? Can we prove every team member has completed HIPAA training? If any of those gave you pause, now’s the time to fix it, before OCR comes asking. Looking for the first step? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand.

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 Penelope Schweitzer No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Abyde Logo

1.800.594.0883 | info@abyde.com

Automated HIPAA and OSHA Compliance

Our Reviews

From Our Blog
  • Don’t Get Caught Off Guard: HIPAA Audits are Back!
  • Don’t Be a Statistic: Why OSHA Compliance Matters in Healthcare
  • What Money Doesn’t Cover: The True Price of HIPAA Non-Compliance
  • HIPAA: It’s Not Just a Training – Your Guide to Continuous Compliance
Solutions
  • HIPAA for Covered Entities
  • OSHA for Healthcare
  • HIPAA for Business Associates
  • SRA for Covered Entities
  • Abyde Incident Response Program
  • Abyde Reseller Program
Resources
  • News
  • Events
  • Partners
  • HIPAA Badges
  • OSHA Badges
  • Learning Center
  • Compliance FAQs
Company
  • About Us
  • Who We Serve
  • Pricing
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • COPYRIGHT © 2026 ABYDE
  • |

  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • |

  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • |

  • SECURITY MEASURES
  • |

  • E-SIGNATURE TERMS