Top 4 HIPAA Violations Your Practice Should Avoid

September 4, 2020

Even with everything else going on in the world today, HIPAA violations are still making headlines. While these news stories reinforce that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) hasn’t let up on HIPAA enforcement, they also provide great examples of what not to do when it comes to your own practice. Based on these violations and recent OCR investigation data, we’ve compiled the top four types of violations investigated by the OCR: 

1. Impermissible Uses & Disclosures

The reigning champion of HIPAA violations over the past 5 years – impermissible uses or disclosures – covers any access, use, or sharing of protected health information (PHI) that is done in a manner not permitted under HIPAA and compromises the security or privacy of a patient’s sensitive information. Common culprits include:

  • Social media disclosures 
  • Careless handling of PHI (often involving theft or loss of unencrypted devices). 
  • Improperly releasing PHI to the press (for example, Memorial Hermann Health System’s $2.4 million settlement resulting from their disclosure of a patient’s PHI in a media press release in 2015). 

Having the right policies in place outlining the proper ways staff may use and disclose PHI is key to ensuring your practice doesn’t join the growing list of improper use violators. 

2. Missing Physical, Technical and Administrative Safeguards

HIPAA law requires practices to implement safeguards to ensure PHI is protected and secured. These safeguards include: 

  • Administrative: the policies and procedures that determine your organization’s processes, roles, and responsibilities. 
  • Physical: the safeguards in place to physically protect your practice and your PHI. This includes anything from locks on your practice doors to security systems. 
  • Technical: safeguards that secure your data from unauthorized access, for example, anti-malware software, encryption, and computer passwords. 

Failing to implement key safeguards is what gets practice’s into trouble, which is why it is essential to perform in-depth as well as ongoing Security Risk Analyses in order to properly identify which safeguards are missing 

3. Improper Access

Your data library shouldn’t be fair game to every employee regardless of their role. Even if just glancing at a patient’s information, any access to patient information that is not necessary to complete a specific job function is a violation of HIPAA. With remote work becoming more and more common, we can expect improper access violations to rise as employees use data in less secure environments and with less supervision than there would be in a typical practice setting. Appropriate access is featured heavily in HIPAA, and it’s important to limit and document your access roles.

It’s not just internal access to PHI that can get your practice into trouble. There are specific guidelines for providing patients with medical records as well, and while this may seem straightforward 51% of providers fail to comply with HIPAA Right of Access laws. Understanding what Patient Right of Access laws entail is important to keeping your patients happy and avoiding a problem with the OCR. 

4. Violations of Minimum Necessary Requirement

Less is more when it comes to sensitive health information. Only the minimum information necessary should be provided when PHI is requested, accessed, or disclosed. Violations of this requirement could include providing additional information such as previous medical conditions that may not pertain to the actual purpose of the task at hand. Having proper training and documented policies in place that define what information is considered necessary is an essential piece to protecting your patient’s information and steering clear of a HIPAA violation.  

A Violation is Just a Slap on the Wrist, Right?

While a violation in any of these areas could be minor, a HIPAA violation fine ranges anywhere from a few hundred to a million dollars based on various factors such as: 

  • Whether there was malicious intent or not
  • The degree of negligence 
  • The number of records exposed
  • If a breach occurred and if it presents a future risk

The biggest fine so far? $16 million in a single settlement. Monetary fines aren’t the only thing you have to worry about if you find yourself facing a HIPAA violation. Jail time and extensive corrective action plans involving extra oversight and administrative work are real possibilities if a violation is found.

So How Can You Best Avoid a HIPAA Violation?

Many HIPAA violations can be attributed to a lack of employee education on what’s required under federal law. Violations aren’t usually intentional or malicious, which is why it’s so important to create a culture of compliance within your organization and promote good habits. Keeping up with your HIPAA compliance program and staying updated on any changes to federal regulations is the best way to keep your patients’ information secure and avoid ending up as another HIPAA headline. 

RECENT POSTS

Related posts

Ambry Phishing Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

$700K HIPAA Settlement: What the Ambry Genetics Phishing Breach Teaches Every Practice

September 21, 2026 No comments yet

September 21, 2026   The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has announced its biggest HIPAA settlement of the year, reaching nearly a million dollars.  Ambry, a genetic testing and clinical genomics provider based in Aliso Viejo, California is at the center of this enforcement. A settlement was reached over a 2020 phishing attack that exposed the Protected Health Information (PHI) of more than 225,000 individuals. This settlement is a clear reminder that even large organizations trip up on HIPAA requirements.    What happened In January 2020, an employee email account at Ambry was compromised through a phishing attack.  The breach potentially exposed a wide range of PHI, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, financial details, and more. Ambry reported the breach to OCR in March 2020, which kicked off the investigation.    Where OCR found gaps OCR’s investigation identified several HIPAA Security Rule gaps, including: No accurate, thorough risk analysis of risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI No process for cutting off access to ePHI when an employee left or no longer needed access No unique user IDs for tracking who was accessing ePHI systems These are baseline HIPAA requirements that every Covered Entity and Business Associate is expected to have in place.   The settlement terms Ambry paid $700,000 and agreed to a two-year corrective action plan, under which it must: Complete a thorough risk analysis of ePHI confidentiality, integrity, and availability Build and execute a risk management plan addressing what that analysis turns up Review and update Security Rule policies and procedures as needed Implement unique user identification across all ePHI systems Train the whole workforce on those updated policies The takeaway for practices When 90% of healthcare hacks start with a successful phishing attempt, it’s key your team is aware of the role they play to keep data safe. Every practice should ask; Do we know exactly where our ePHI lives and how it moves through our systems? Do we have a current, documented risk analysis? Would we catch it fast if a former employee’s access wasn’t revoked? Looking for the first step of addressing these gaps? Meet with one of our compliance experts to see where you currently stand. 

Azul Vision Right of Access
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

Right of Access Enforcement Hits Eye Care: Inside the Azul Vision Settlement

September 1, 2026 No comments yet

September 1, 2026   The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced its 55th settlement under the HIPAA Right of Access Initiative, and this one is a good reminder that “we’ll get to it” is an easy shortcut to a massive financial penalty.   What happened Azul Vision, Inc., a California optometry enterprise healthcare provider, took nearly two years to provide a patient her healthcare records failed to give a patient timely access to her health records. She requested her records in January 2023. She didn’t actually receive them until January 2025, or two years later, and only after OCR opened an investigation following her complaint in April 2023.   The importance of Right of Access The HIPAA Privacy Rule’s Right of Access is straightforward: patients are entitled to their healthcare records within 30 days of a request, with one possible 30-day extension if needed.    The cost Azul Vision agreed to a two-year, OCR-monitored corrective action plan and paid $50,000. The corrective action plan requires the practice to: Review and revise its written policies and procedures for Privacy Rule compliance.  Regularly report to HHS a log of every PHI access request it receives, including when it came in and when it was resolved, Train all workforce members on right of access requirements and the practice’s own procedures.   Practical takeaways Have a documented, assigned process for access requests: not an informal “someone will handle it” arrangement. Track every request against the 30-day (or extended 60-day) clock: If nothing is timestamping requests, nothing is catching the ones that slip. Train staff specifically on right of access: this is a distinct Privacy Rule obligation from general HIPAA awareness, and it’s clearly one OCR is actively enforcing.   The bottom line A single records request that went unanswered turned into a $50,000 penalty, two years of federal monitoring, and a detrimental hit to the organization’s reputation. That’s a steep price for what really comes down to a missing process. If your team can’t answer “what happens the moment a patient asks for their records?” right now, that’s the gap to close before your practice ends up as OCR’s next enforcement case. Want a streamlined way to close your compliance gaps? Meet with an Abyde expert today!

OSF Healthcare HIPAA Settlement
Abyde News, Fines, HIPAA

What OSF Healthcare’s Ransomware Fine Teaches Every Practice About SRAs

August 5, 2026 No comments yet

August 5, 2026 The latest HIPAA fine is another clear reminder that ransomware attacks are, unfortunately, here to stay in the healthcare industry. A settlement involving the OSF Healthcare System was recently announced by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). As an enterprise healthcare provider in the midwest, the organization serves 174 locations, including 16 hospitals – a prime target for a ransomware attack.    So, what happened?  In April 2021, OSF discovered that they joined the unlucky club of ransomware victims when a malicious actor deployed Nephilim, a ransomware strain made to target larger organizations. Once the ransomware infected OSF systems, the hacker demanded payment or patient Protected Health Information (PHI) would be leaked online. In this attack, sensitive information like financial account information, driver’s license numbers, medical record numbers, and more, were all exposed. Over 53,000 patient records were exposed in this attack.  When ransomware attacks in healthcare have soared 278% in recent years, it’s more of a when then an if your organization doesn’t have the right safeguards in place.  While the breach was discovered in April, OSF healthcare reported the breach to the OCR in October. The OCR took it from there, digging into what precautions (or lack thereof) let this happen.  What did the OCR discover? If you’ve read any of our other fine breakdowns, you already know where this is going: another missing Security Risk Analysis (SRA).  The SRA is a required document every HIPAA-regulated entity (ie: every practice and their Business Associates that handle patient information) needs to complete. The SRA is a thorough review of the physical, technical, and administrative safeguards in place to prevent PHI ending up in the wrong hands. While the OCR didn’t specify exactly how the ransomware got into OSF’s system, a technical safeguard vulnerability was very likely the entry point. A proactive SRA could have flagged that gap before it turned into a major breach. In addition to missing this required documentation, OSF also took too long to report the breach to the OCR and notify affected patients. This is a direct violation of the Breach Notification Rule, which requires organizations to notify patients within 60 days of a discovered breach. Moreover, since the breach impacted more than 500 patients, OSF was also required to report this breach to the OCR within 2 months as well. Time is of the essence in every component of a breach, from securing systems to ensuring affected parties are aware to protect themselves and an over five month delay was unacceptable in the eyes of the OCR.    What was the result?  OSF’s settlement tops the list as the largest fine of the year, coming in at $552,250, plus government monitoring for the next two years.  It’s very important to note that this breach occurred in 2021, meaning that over five years were spent from the initial breach, to investigations, to the public press releases. Also, the average cost of a healthcare breach is over 7 million dollars –  from implementing secure systems, notifying patients, legal fees, and more. The Takeaway While the settlement payment and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) are just the cherries on top, this experience was a tremendous cost of time, money, and resources, highlighting the importance of making sure everything is secure before a situation occurs.  So, when was the last time you looked at your SRA? It’s time to seriously analyze your current compliance posture. Ransomware groups don’t check whether you’re a small dental office or a 16-hospital health system before they attack, they check whether the door was left open. Time and again, OCR’s findings come back to the same root cause: organizations can’t secure what they haven’t even identified as a problem. Looking to review your current compliance standings? Meet with our team of experts for a complimentary educational consultation.